I am finally writing a review of sorts
on the book Erasing Hell by Francis Chan and Preston Sprinkle as promised in one of my early posts called “Erasing Hell: What a
great idea”* (see link below). I read the book back in the days of my intense study
on final judgment when a defender of hell suggested it as a solution
to my concerns.
I actually like Francis Chan from what
I can discern about him. He seems very sincere and passionate and
wants to be humble. The introduction in the book was so familiar, like something
I could have written. It gave me hope he would present a biblical, well
thought-out study on the subject. In fact, the first part of the book
does give some good, basic information on the doctrine of hell and
the passages commonly associated with that subject.
I was pleased that he came to the same
conclusion as I did about the parable of Lazarus and the rich man.
Namely, that “...this passage doesn't refer to the final state of
the wicked – only to a temporary state where the wicked await
judgment.” 2 So, that parable does not teach about 'hell' (like Mr.
Chan's friend and contemporary Mark Driscoll preaches) and that Hades is
not the same as Gehenna - unfortunately, both words are translated as
hell in many translations.
He discusses and makes a long and
thorough case against universalism and Rob Bell. He also
addresses annihilationism (a general term encompassing those who
believe that the lake of fire will ultimately destroy the wicked) but
does not shoot it down like he does with universalism. I was pleased
that he gave credence to that view.
However, as he came to his conclusions,
the annihilist view was completely forgotten. He concluded that the traditional doctrine of eternal torment in a place he continually
called 'hell' was the only biblical truth he could endorse.
That is not only frustrating, but
baffling! Mr. Chan goes through the trouble to give us the facts
about final judgment, but then turns his back on a legitimate view of
judgment as if he demonstrated it was false. Which he didn't!
They state in the book, “At times,
Jesus seems to imply that hell won't last very long. 'Fear Him who
can destroy both soul and body in hell,' Jesus
says (Matt. 10:28). Destroy, not burn forever.
This language of destruction is common not only in Jesus' words but
also throughout Paul's letters.” (emphasis is Chan's) 3
They also write: “In almost every
passage where Jesus mentions hell, he doesn't explicitly say that it
will last forever. He speaks of torment, and we get the impression
that hell is terrible, that it's a place to be avoided at all costs,
but He doesn't clearly tell us how long it will last.” 4
Francis himself admits,“The debate
about hell's duration is much more complex than I first assumed.
While I lean heavily on the side that says it is everlasting, I am
not ready to claim that with complete certainty. I encourage you to
continue researching...” 5 So, bless his heart, he confesses
that, for him, he realizes there is no certainty in eternal torment.
Why are we not then teaching this? I did continue researching and the
weight of Scripture has not come down on the side of eternal torment!
That we would all take Francis Chan's advice on this point!
I have written over 40 posts on this
subjects, but if you were to ask me where to go for 'further
research' without the hours and hours of study (although I recommend
this), I would send you to the following website, which I found
recently (March 2015):
So, back to Erasing Hell. There
is some good information in there, but just like any bit of
information, if you have 90% truth and 10% error (or deceit) then you
have an untrustworthy body of information.
I believe Chan's prayer in his
introduction. He wants God's truth. I prayed almost the same prayer
myself every time I sought to study the subject. The important part
of seeking the truth in these extremely unclear areas is to realize
that it is foolishness to claim absolute conclusions. Who can say, “I
have figured out God's ways in the Judgment and this is how He will
do things...”?
I am uncertain exactly how God will
execute judgment on the world, but I have become increasingly
confident that eternal torment is not part of God's ways or
character. My goal is to bring this subject into the light of
Scripture to be examined and scrutinized because the implications of
eternal torment are, in my opinion, too great to accept without
careful and labored attention.
The fact is, those who hold to conditionalism or annihilationism believe in 'hell' (although I don't choose to use that unbiblical word). It is the nature of hell that is on trial. It is our human traditions that are on trial. In other words, conditionalists are not trying to erase hell. To imply that they are is an erroneous view and, frankly, deceitful. By throwing annihilationism in with universalism (which I have seen repeatedly) robs believers of valuable information in forming their Scriptural world view. In this way, it is a shame that Erasing Hell was not more forthcoming and honest. As with many mainstream (approved) evangelical books, it had an agenda.
Wouldn't I love to sit down for coffee
with Francis and have some hours of conversation on this topic, among
others. As a sister and brother in Christ, getting to the heart of it
all. Somehow, I think under all the political and peer pressure, past
all the traditional contemporaries breathing down his back, deep down
he senses something isn't right with eternal torment.
And he wouldn't be alone. Chan's co-author on this very book has changed his views from traditional to conditional.
"Hell is a crucial topic, especially for evangelicals. And it needs to be revisited. Rethinking Hell is doing the church a great service by stirring discussion and forcing us to read what the Bible says about Hell." - Preston Sprinkle, co-author of Erasing Hell6
2 Erasing Hell: What God said about
eternity and the things we made up, Francis Chan and Preston
Sprinkle, published by David C Cook, Colorado Springs, CO., p. 80,
89.
3 Chan and Preston, p.
79.
4 Chan and Preston, p.
81.
